<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Easy Form Validation Requires No Javascript Library</title> <atom:link href="http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/</link> <description>- Hunting the Best Open Source Resources for Web Developers</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:17:16 -0700</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: 18 Impressive Web Form Validation Scripts to Enhance User Experience&#160;&#124;&#160;Dzine Blog</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30333</link> <dc:creator>18 Impressive Web Form Validation Scripts to Enhance User Experience&#160;&#124;&#160;Dzine Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30333</guid> <description>[...] 2.) Easy Form Validation Requires No Javascript Library [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2.) Easy Form Validation Requires No Javascript Library [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christian</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30107</link> <dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:55:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30107</guid> <description>Frank: I agree, you need to validate on the server as well. But that doesn&#039;t mean you can&#039;t catch errors as early as possible to aid the user.Rob: I&#039;d be happy to help out. Pop me an email on christian at cjohansen.no and I&#039;ll check out your problem. I&#039;m using Validatious successfully on several sites.Simplenews: Well, the screenshot is just one example of how you can deploy Validatious. Validatious is really a JS validation engine - it does not ship any ready-to-use design. It&#039;s designed to be highly flexible, and you can configure everything such as when to do validation. Additionally, you can write your own error formatting code for highly customized applications. Do give it a shot!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank: I agree, you need to validate on the server as well. But that doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t catch errors as early as possible to aid the user.</p><p>Rob: I&#8217;d be happy to help out. Pop me an email on christian at cjohansen.no and I&#8217;ll check out your problem. I&#8217;m using Validatious successfully on several sites.</p><p>Simplenews: Well, the screenshot is just one example of how you can deploy Validatious. Validatious is really a JS validation engine &#8211; it does not ship any ready-to-use design. It&#8217;s designed to be highly flexible, and you can configure everything such as when to do validation. Additionally, you can write your own error formatting code for highly customized applications. Do give it a shot!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Frank</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30062</link> <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:01:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30062</guid> <description>Nice, but as any JS validation not secure enough. Form validation must be done server-side.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, but as any JS validation not secure enough. Form validation must be done server-side.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30061</link> <dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:14:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30061</guid> <description>tried for about an hour to get this to work with no success... i followed the getting started instructions perfectly, and nothing shows up.ah well...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tried for about an hour to get this to work with no success&#8230; i followed the getting started instructions perfectly, and nothing shows up.</p><p>ah well&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dorac</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30027</link> <dc:creator>Dorac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:52:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30027</guid> <description>Was just looking for this thanks!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was just looking for this thanks!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simplenews RSS</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30025</link> <dc:creator>Simplenews RSS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:22:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30025</guid> <description>Thanks for sharing,We were looking for just such a thing. But I think they didn&#039;t work enough on a few things. For example the messages pop up immediately even if you didn&#039;t enter anything. Inline-validation is a very complicated thing as this great article shows:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/inline-validation-in-web-forms/I don&#039;t even know if it&#039;s an advantage for a normal registration form with a maximum of 4 fields like ours. So we decided to leave it out.Some designs like signup on twitter are incredible of course. For example they don&#039;t display &quot;can&#039;t be left empty&quot; but &quot;please enter&quot; in grey when a field is focused. That&#039;s a great solution and it&#039;s my suggestion for validitious.Another thing is, that it&#039;s not clear what the checkmark means. For that see the article I mentioned. BTW: Twitter got that right too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing,</p><p>We were looking for just such a thing. But I think they didn&#8217;t work enough on a few things. For example the messages pop up immediately even if you didn&#8217;t enter anything. Inline-validation is a very complicated thing as this great article shows:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/inline-validation-in-web-forms/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alistapart.com/articles/inline-validation-in-web-forms/</a></p><p>I don&#8217;t even know if it&#8217;s an advantage for a normal registration form with a maximum of 4 fields like ours. So we decided to leave it out.</p><p>Some designs like signup on twitter are incredible of course. For example they don&#8217;t display &#8220;can&#8217;t be left empty&#8221; but &#8220;please enter&#8221; in grey when a field is focused. That&#8217;s a great solution and it&#8217;s my suggestion for validitious.</p><p>Another thing is, that it&#8217;s not clear what the checkmark means. For that see the article I mentioned. BTW: Twitter got that right too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: grimen</title><link>http://www.webappers.com/2009/11/03/easy-form-validation-requires-no-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-30024</link> <dc:creator>grimen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:08:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/?p=1890#comment-30024</guid> <description>It&#039;s an awesome library, very thorough code as well. Def check it out. FYI: I made a Rails plugin that maps ActiveRecord model validations to Validatious 2.0:http://github.com/validatious-on-rails</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an awesome library, very thorough code as well. Def check it out. FYI: I made a Rails plugin that maps ActiveRecord model validations to Validatious 2.0:</p><p><a
href="http://github.com/validatious-on-rails" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/validatious-on-rails</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enchanced) (user agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via maxcdn.webappers.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: ps11300.dreamhostps.com @ 2010-03-21 18:14:06 -->