Comments on: AtMail Open: Redefining Open Source Webmail

By: sp3icher

sp3icher — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:55:59 +0000

yeah…. i realy like it

By: fastopa

fastopa — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:22:25 +0000

We have been using AtMail for almost 5 years now. We pay for support. However, support from AtMail is non-existent. We have been trying for months now to get AtMail to deal with some issues and they have not dealt with them. They respond, but do not actually do anything. Functionality claims are not always supported.

As email is very important and downtime cannot be tolerated, we are now switching to Zimbra. I must say, a much better product. Slightly more expensive, but well worth it! There pricing model is very flexible allowing for different types of users.

It is also a true MS Exchange replacement with full mobile syncronization support. No BES server required for Blackberries.

There support has been very good. Anyone considering a collaboration suite should have a look at this.

Beware of AtMail promises.

By: koji

koji — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:25:37 +0000

We bought the commercial version in our organization (actually 5000 mail accounts) and it has been a total disaster, we’ve gone back to our previous webmail (squirrel) due to the problems and the fatal support by atmail (we opened like 20 errors/questions remaining unsolved and without response for more than a month).

-Lots of problems with charsets (We use catalan as main language), causing the mails not be viewable in explorer and others shown as void e-mails when they had content.

-Lots of little bugs annoying users (drafts losing fields, no priorities shown, session timeout without announce, iSync not working fine …)

But the worst is not having response from the support team for the errors, we’ve been losing a lot of time triying to patch the system for ourselves, but finally we decided to return to the previous webmail…

By: Jerry M

Jerry M — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:52:37 +0000

It looks pretty fine…
But we really have other greener options like Taroby, which is a saas application, and could be accessed from anywhere across the globe with the help of a browser and internet connection. Taroby works with a “unique and green concept” of a “team inbox” allowing sharing of e-mail accounts among the members of the team.

By: FoxyMelody

FoxyMelody — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:54:05 +0000

Its terrible, I switched our entire company to Zimbra because the Ajax simply did not work.

By: Santiago

Santiago — Sun, 25 May 2008 06:58:08 +0000

atMail is really great for a simple and intituive IMAP web based mail. I have used roundcube and atMail, both are great, probably atMail is more stable because roundcube is in beta testing, thought i have never seen an open version of atMail. Does anybody knows if it is from the same people that made the paid atMail? (atmail.com)…. i had to use roundcube for the web site of my faculty (www.fstuisek.org) because the commercial version of atMail you have to purchase and our site is non-profit. Anyway i will install it and test it, hope there is no security issues

By: XGhozt

XGhozt — Sat, 24 May 2008 00:30:34 +0000

I bet I could integrate with cPanel.

By: jopp05

jopp05 — Fri, 23 May 2008 17:28:57 +0000

I think rouncube is a great option too (http://roundcube.net/)

By: matt s

matt s — Fri, 23 May 2008 16:09:14 +0000

looks impressive at first glance… be nice to see a head-to-head comparison of atmail and roundcube.

By: Wwwhat’s new? - Aplicaciones web gratuitas - » atMail - solución de webmail con código libre

Fri, 23 May 2008 12:42:32 +0000

[...] la opción de enviar videomail usando directamente la webcam, rápido e indoloro: fuente: webappers Leed Tambiénopenkm.com – Herramienta web, con código libre, de gestión de archivos Insoshi – [...]