<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spellify &#8211; Automatic Text Field Spell Checker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/</link>
	<description>- Hunting the Best Open Source Resources for Web Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/comment-page-1/#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/#comment-3016</guid>
		<description>@ Joe, this is exactly what I tell my customers, though they still told me they wanted me to build in spell checking functionality. They wanted the user experience to be the same cross browser.

It&#039;s pretty cool and I&#039;ve already implemented it into one of my b2b solutions.

Thanks Ray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Joe, this is exactly what I tell my customers, though they still told me they wanted me to build in spell checking functionality. They wanted the user experience to be the same cross browser.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty cool and I&#8217;ve already implemented it into one of my b2b solutions.</p>
<p>Thanks Ray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Firefox does this for you automatically in text fields and textareas.  And since 30% of people use that and the other browsers will have to copy firefox, I don&#039;t really see the need for this.  Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox does this for you automatically in text fields and textareas.  And since 30% of people use that and the other browsers will have to copy firefox, I don&#8217;t really see the need for this.  Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readywpthemes</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>readywpthemes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t work with IE6 well. There is some tranparent .png issue I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t work with IE6 well. There is some tranparent .png issue I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XGhozt</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/comment-page-1/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>XGhozt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2008/01/04/spellify-automatic-text-field-spell-checker/#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>I could see me using this now and then, it&#039;s better than using google.com for spelling! Yeah, I do that. &gt;.&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see me using this now and then, it&#8217;s better than using google.com for spelling! Yeah, I do that. &gt;.&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
