<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Silverlight for Rich Interactive Web Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/</link>
	<description>- Hunting the Best Open Source Resources for Web Developers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nismoto</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>Nismoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>So how is this any better than Flash? Or is Microsoft just trying to get a piece too?

Leland, we expect users to do a lot of things: download Flash plug-ins, accept EULAs and Terms &#38; Conditions, enable JavaScript, etc. That isn't necessarily a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how is this any better than Flash? Or is Microsoft just trying to get a piece too?</p>
<p>Leland, we expect users to do a lot of things: download Flash plug-ins, accept EULAs and Terms &amp; Conditions, enable JavaScript, etc. That isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leland</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>Good, but do we really want someone to have to download an add-on just to view our site? Not me, at least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, but do we really want someone to have to download an add-on just to view our site? Not me, at least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info Truth.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Silverlight for Rich Interactive Web Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Info Truth.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Silverlight for Rich Interactive Web Applications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webappers.com/2007/09/23/microsoft-silverlight-for-rich-interactive-web-applications/#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Ray Cheung [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by Ray Cheung [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
